Quilodran-Brau v. Holland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] court's scheduling order, issued in accordance with Rule 16, “is not a frivolous piece of paper, idly entered, which can be cavalierly disregarded by counsel without peril.”
• “disruption caused by the proliferation of untimely expert testimony is real”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).