Skip to main content
· 1/20/1984

Quillen v. Tull

Citations

  • 312 S.E.2d 278
  • 226 Va. 498
  • 1984 Va. LEXIS 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court partitioned the property after receiving evidence on enhancements to the property and the increase in value they produced
  • “If a tenant desires compensation for enhancement, he must request it in his pleadings; if, however, the parties’ testimony treats permanent improvements as calling for compensation, a specific pleading is unnecessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.