· 1/20/1984
Quillen v. Tull
Citations
- 312 S.E.2d 278
- 226 Va. 498
- 1984 Va. LEXIS 288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court partitioned the property after receiving evidence on enhancements to the property and the increase in value they produced
- “If a tenant desires compensation for enhancement, he must request it in his pleadings; if, however, the parties’ testimony treats permanent improvements as calling for compensation, a specific pleading is unnecessary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cochran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.