Quillen v. Roseburg Forest Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ORCP 10 C did not apply where statute expressly provided that the specified action must be taken “only” in accordance with statutory time requirements
• rejecting contention that ORCP 10 operated to extend time for filing complaint where statute specified that complaint must be filed within 90 days “after mailing” of applicable notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).