Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 3/16/2010

Quigley v. Winter

Citations

  • 598 F.3d 938
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5364
  • 2010 WL 909603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a district court's failure to analyze a civil rights fee award using the lodestar approach is an abuse of discretion
  • finding that in an FHA action, the district court properly admitted evidence that the landlord-defendant's former tenants experienced sexual harassment similar to that experienced by the plaintiff
  • noting “that the usual procedure is to remand any further consideration of an attorney fee award to the district court”
  • reducing overall fees by one-third in part because “the complexity of the issues in this case simply did not warrant the requested amount of ‘lawyering’ ”
  • affirming jury's determination that landlord violated FHA where the evidence indicated that he sexually harassed a tenant when receiving rent payments
  • affirming jury’s determination that landlord violated FHA where the evidence indicated that he sexually harassed a tenant when receiving rent payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Hansen, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Quigley v. Winter

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.