Quigley v. Swank
Citations
- 11 Pa. Super. 602
- 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185
Syllabus
<p>Evidence — Examination in chief- — Previous declarations of witness.</p> <p>Evidence of previous declarations of a witness for plaintiff, confirmatory of his testimony, are not admissible in the presentation of plaintiff’s case in chief.</p> <p>Evidence — Wife as claimant — Burden of proof.</p> <p>In a contest between a wife and a creditor of her husband it is competent to show the circumstances and income of the husband. The burden is upon the wife to show how she acquired title to the property as against her husband’s creditor.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Beeber, Orxady, Porter, Rice, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hester v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1877-10-02· cited 67×
- Zell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1880-02-24· cited 33×
- Clever v. HilberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-05-23· cited 18×
- Covanhovan v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1853-09-08· cited 13×
- Holmes v. TalladaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-03-25· cited 10×
- McKee v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1847-10-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.