Tenth Circuit· 10/17/2005
Quigley v. Rosenthal
Citations
- 427 F.3d 1232
- 63 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 289
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22327
- 2005 WL 2644835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the amended final judgment qualified because an appeal could 12 be taken from it
- concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding the proffered reasons did not amount to excusable neglect
- holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting an untimely motion for attorneys’ fees when the movant did not show excusable neglect
- explaining that where there is a new judg- ment following reversal, “the entry of such a judgment trig- gers the running (for a second time) of the fourteen-day time period set forth in Rule 54(d)(2)(B)”
- applying the Torres standard to a claim of excusable neglect under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)
- affirming denial of out-of-time motion where movant failed to allege facts necessary to support finding of “excusable neglect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Hartz, Herrera
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McGraw v. BarnhartTenth Circuit· 2006-06-13· cited 434×
- LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, Accidental Death & Dismemberment & Dependent Life Insurance PlanTenth Circuit· 2010-05-06· cited 154×
- Perez v. El Tequila, LLCTenth Circuit· 2017-02-07· cited 116×
- Debord v. Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2013-11-26· cited 84×
- Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.D. New Mexico· 2011-07-14· cited 26×
- Estate of Anderson v. Denny's Inc.D. New Mexico· 2013-02-07· cited 21×
- Vanguard Environmental, Inc. v. KerinTenth Circuit· 2008-06-09· cited 16×
- Breaux v. American Family Mutual InsuranceTenth Circuit· 2009-01-06· cited 16×
- Kathy Radtke v. Maria CaschettaD.C. Circuit· 2016-05-03· cited 13×
- Sizemore v. State of New Mexico Department of LaborTenth Circuit· 2006-06-22· cited 13×
- In Re SukmungsaD. Utah· 2005-11-23· cited 6×
- Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2014-10-20· cited 4×
- Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2014-08-18
- Agi Suretrack LLC v. Farmers Edge Inc.Federal Circuit· 2026-06-02
- United States v. SmithTenth Circuit· 2026-06-09
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 5,239×
- United States v. TorresTenth Circuit· 2004-06-16· cited 173×
- Esposito v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 96×
- Essence, Inc. v. City of Federal HeightsTenth Circuit· 2002-04-08· cited 84×
- Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2004-02-10· cited 75×
- Quigley v. RosenthalTenth Circuit· 2003-04-22· cited 55×
- United States v. Ronald \Boo\ ColvinNinth Circuit· 2000-03-01· cited 53×
- United States v. Santee Sioux TribeSupreme Court· 2004-03-01· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.