Quigley v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here is no explicit requirement that the ALJ make findings regarding every piece of evidence that is entitled to weight”
• There is a presumption that the ALJ has “considered all of the evidence” in a given case, and there is “no explicit requirement that the ALJ make findings regarding every piece of evidence that is entitled to weight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).