Skip to main content
· 1/20/2000

Quigley v. Austeel Lemont Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 79 F. Supp. 2d 941
  • 10 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 351
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 429
  • 2000 WL 51446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because [plaintiff] admits that his drug use did not impact his work, [he] has failed to establish that his alleged disability substantially limits the major life activity of working.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alesia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.