Quick v. United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards & Technology

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “even assuming that individuals other than Quick m’ay have been subject to the alleged ‘pattern or practice,’ the record is clear that Quick was not. That being the case, Quick lacks standing to pursue such a claim in this action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).