Quick v. Deichsel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Section 43(a) includes 6 causes of action grounded in allegations of false or misleading descriptions of fact and false or 7 misleading representations of fact
• recognizing McCarthy's view of famous marks doctrine without deciding its correctness
• affirming district court’s conclusion that defendant did not act in bad faith where defendant believed it was the senior user of the mark when it began using the mark and plaintiff did not present any credible evidence that defendant did not believe it owned the mark at that time
• “A plaintiff claiming unfair competition under New York law must show that the defendant acted in bad faith.”
• “We find no error in the District Court’s bad faith determination and therefore affirm the dismissal of the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).