Quevreaux v. Randolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was permissible for a lay witness to testify to his understanding of defendant’s ambiguous references and unfinished sentences
• holding that it was permissible for a lay witness to testify to his understanding of defendant’s ambiguous references and unfinished sentences
• permitting a participant in conversations with the defendant to offer lay opinion as to meaning of coded statements because it was based on his \direct perception of the event\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).