Skip to main content
· 1/9/2003

Quenzer v. Advanta Mortgage Corp. USA

Citations

  • 288 B.R. 884
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2131
  • 2003 WL 354919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that legislative history confirms that Congress intended the courts to have authority to impose equitable conditions at any time during the rescission process to insure that the consumer complies with his or her obligations under TILA
  • “Even though defendant violated TILA, automatically relegating its entire claim to unsecured status under these circumstances would be completely inequitable and would exact a penalty entirely disproportionate to its offense.”
  • “Even though the defendant violated TILA, automatically relegating its entire claim to unsecured status under these circumstances would be completely inequitable and would exact a penalty entirely disproportionate to its offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.