· 10/13/2023
Queen Graphics & Printworks Inc. v. Eric Guerra D/B/A Lonestar Mailing Solutions
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, for purposes of federal habeas corpus jurisdiction, a petitioner who is \in custody” for one of a series of consecutive sentences is \in custody” for all of those sentences
- holding that a prisoner remains “in custody” under all imposed consecutive sentences until they are served
- holding that petitioner serving consecutive sentences is \in custody\ and may attack the sentence scheduled to run first, even after it has expired
- holding that \a prisoner serving consecutive sentences is 'in custody' under any one of them\ for purposes of collateral review
- holding that where a petitioner is serving consecutive sentences, the first of which has expired, he is “in custody” for the purpose of collaterally attacking the expired sentence
- holding that a prisoner serving consecutive sentences is considered in custody under each sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.