Skip to main content
· 10/13/2023

Queen Graphics & Printworks Inc. v. Eric Guerra D/B/A Lonestar Mailing Solutions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, for purposes of federal habeas corpus jurisdiction, a petitioner who is \in custody” for one of a series of consecutive sentences is \in custody” for all of those sentences
  • holding that a prisoner remains “in custody” under all imposed consecutive sentences until they are served
  • holding that petitioner serving consecutive sentences is \in custody\ and may attack the sentence scheduled to run first, even after it has expired
  • holding that \a prisoner serving consecutive sentences is 'in custody' under any one of them\ for purposes of collateral review
  • holding that where a petitioner is serving consecutive sentences, the first of which has expired, he is “in custody” for the purpose of collaterally attacking the expired sentence
  • holding that a prisoner serving consecutive sentences is considered in custody under each sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.