Quebec Steamship Co. v. Merchant
Citations
- 133 U.S. 375
- 10 S. Ct. 397
- 33 L. Ed. 656
- 1890 U.S. LEXIS 1919
Syllabus
<p>The stewardess of a steam-vessel belonging to a corporation sued it to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her. She came out of the cabin, which was on deck, to throw the contents of a pail over the-side of the vessel, at a gangway facing the door of the cabin, and leaned over a railing at the gangway, composed of four horizontal rods, which gave way, because not properly secured, and she fell into the water, probably striking, the side of a boat. The rods were movable, to make a gangway, and had been recently opened to take off some baggage of passengers, and not properly replaced. The porter and the carpenter had attempted to replace them, but left the work, knowing that it was unfinished. The persons composing the ship’s company were divided into three classes of servants, called three departments — the deck department, containing the first and second officers, the purser, the carpenter and the sailors; the engineer’s department, containing' the engineers, the firemen and the coal-passers; and the steward’s depái cment, containing the steward, the waiters, the cooks, the .porter and the stewardess. Every one on board, including the plaintiff, had signed the shipping articles, and she had participated in salvage given to the vessel. The master was in command of the whole vessel; Held; that the porter and the carpenter were fellow-servants with the plaintiff, and that the corporation was not liable to her for any damages..</p> <p>The Circuit Court left it to the jury to determine, if they found there was negligence, whether the injury was occasioned by the careless act of a servant not employed in the same department with the plaintiff; Held, error, and that the court ought to have directed the jury, as requested, to find for the defendant, on the ground that the negligence was that of a fellow-servant, either the porter or the carpenter.</p> <p>The verdict was for $5000, and the judgment was for that amount, and $306 interest for the time between
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.