· 3/1/1976
Quatsling v. Arizona
Citations
- 424 U.S. 945
- 96 S. Ct. 1416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming admission of incriminating statements related to uncharged offense that were obtained after defendants had been indicted for another crime
- finding sufficient the district court's \explicit limiting instruction to the jurors\
- the statement was made while cooperating with the police and the declarant would not be prosecuted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.