· 11/16/1959

Quarles v. Albritton

Citations

116 So. 2d 175
1959 La. App. LEXIS 1064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

where trial court’s “conclusions are logical and supported by evidence of record” then it “did not commit a palpable abuse of discretion” by rejecting weight claim
where trial court’s “conclusions are logical and supported by evidence of record,” it then “did not commit a palpable abuse of discretion” by rejecting a weight claim
where trial court’s “conclusions are logical and supported by evidence of record” then it “did not commit a palpable abuse of discretion” by rejecting a weight claim
where trial court’s “conclusions are logical and supported by evidence of record” then it “did not commit a palpable abuse of discretion” by rejecting a weight claim
where trial court’s “conclusions are logical and supported by evidence of record” then it “did not commit a palpable abuse of discretion” by rejecting a weight claim
where trial court’s “conclusions are logical and supported by evidence of record” then it “did not commit a palpable abuse of discretion” by rejecting a weight claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Culpepper, Ellis, Lottinger, Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.