Skip to main content
· 9/29/2023

Quander v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the filing of a proper amended return does not purge the fraud evidenced by the filing of a fraudulent original return
  • holding that the filing of a proper amended return does not purge the fraud evidenced by the filing of a fraudulent original return
  • ruling that — for purposes of determining a statute of limitations — even admittedly fraudulent returns can be returns under the tax laws, if they “appeared on their faces to constitute endeavors to satisfy the law”
  • holding that \an amended return is a creature of administrative origin and grace\
  • holding “a taxpayer who submits a fraudulent return does not purge the fraud by subsequent voluntary disclosure”
  • affirming that a taxpayer's later behavior does not absolve a taxpayer of his antecedent fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Carl J. Nichols

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.