Quan v. Truck Insurance Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that complaint does not raise possibility of coverage for “accidents” even if it includes negligence-based causes of action when it alleges conduct that is not accidental
• “[W]hether the insured intended the harm that resulted from his conduct is not determinative. The question is whether an accident gave rise to claimant’s injuries”
• “[Wjhether the insured intended the harm that resulted from his conduct is not determinative.”
• “[E]ven if a jury was to find that the insured was mistaken in his belief as to whether the claimant ‘consented’ to the touching, embracing, kissing or sexual intercourse, there was still no additional happening constituting an 3 23-2776 “accident” which caused the injuries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).