Quality Infusion Care, Inc. v. Health Care Service Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plan “does not specify that the overpayment must be offset against the same patient’s future claim”
• “[A]n assignee . . . stands in the same position as its assignor stood.” (ellipses in original) (quoting Houk v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 173 F.2d 821, 825 (5th Cir. 1949))
• “No language in any of the three plans require BCBS to confine its contractual setoff rights to deductions from subsequent benefit payments to the same patient or under the same plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).