Quality Granite Construction Co. v. Hurst-Rosche Engineers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that accusations made against corporate plaintiff imputed an inabiUty to perform and prejudiced the entity in its trade
• defendants’ statements that plaintiffs “failure to complete the project in a timely manner, substandard workmanship, reluctance to complete punch list items and inability to correctly interpret the contract documents”
• defendants’ statements that plaintiffs “ ‘failure to complete the project in a timely manner, substandard workmanship, reluctance to complete punch list items and inability to [correctly] interpret the contract documents’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).