Quality Discount Tires, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the a principle enunciated by the Supreme Court as to the Sherman Act did not preclude plaintiff’s suit under the Maryland Antitrust Act
• holding that the a principle enunciated by the Supreme Court as to the Sherman Act did not preclude plaintiff's suit under the Maryland Antitrust Act
• holding that Supreme Court’s Colgate principal did not preclude plaintiffs suit under Maryland antitrust law
• holding that Supreme Court's Colgate principal did not preclude plaintiff's suit under Maryland antitrust law
• amendments to pleadings “should be freely allowed to serve the ends of justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).