Quality C.A.T v. Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government’s position was substantially justified only up to the point in the proceedings at which it became apparent that its theory was \unsupportable\
• while General Counsel was substantially justified in filing charge, the evidence adduced at trial rendered General Counsel’s theory “unsupportable,” and thus its continued pursuit of the case unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).