Qualchoice, Inc. v. Robin Rowland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Supreme Court’s intervening opinions, including Knudson, compelled it to “abandon” its prior position that federal common law provided a basis for a fiduciary’s reimbursement claim
• analyzing similar circumstances as a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
• “[A] plaintiff is not necessarily required to prove wrongdoing by the defendant in order to obtain relief through imposition of a constructive trust or an equitable lien.”
• plaintiff “not necessarily required to prove wrongdoing by the defendant in order to obtain relief through imposition of a constructive trust or an equitable lien” because constructive trust is based on property, not wrongs [quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).