· 5/22/1986
Quaker State Mushroom Co. v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.
Citations
- 635 F. Supp. 1281
- 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 365
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the seller’s shipment in response to the buyer’s purchase order did not constitute acceptance of the buyer’s price because the seller had notified the buyer that it was rejecting the buyer’s price before shipping
- observing that the seller’s shipment in response to the buyer’s purchase order did not constitute acceptance of the buyer’s price because the seller had notified the buyer that it was rejecting the buyer’s price before shipping
- “It is clear that the parties intended to have a contract, acted as if they had a contract, but had not agreed upon a price for the goods.... Sellers usually do not ship and buyers to not receive goods unless they think they have struck a deal.”
- “It is clear that the parties intended to have a contract, acted as if they had a contract, but had not agreed upon a price for the goods.… Sellers usually do not ship and buyers to not receive goods unless they think they have struck a deal.”
- applying UCC under Illinois law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aspen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.