Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation v. Union Sanitary District, and A.P.T., Inc., a California Corp. D/B/A Calvert Environmental, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ourts may take cognizance of, and benefit from, the proceedings before the patent examiner,” although “the question [of validity] is ultimately for the courts to decide, without deference to the rulings of the patent examiner”
• “In legal principle, the filing of a terminal disclaimer simply serves the statutory function of removing the rejection of double patenting, and raises neither presumption nor estoppel on the merits of the rejection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).