Skip to main content
· 6/30/1995

Quackenbush v. Armato, Gaims, Weil, West & Epstein

Citations

  • 36 Cal. App. 4th 363
  • 42 Cal. Rptr. 2d 498
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 8707
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5191
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding trial court erred in drawing negative inference from co-respondent's invocation of privilege against self-incrimination
  • finding trial court erred in drawing negative inference from co-respondent’s invocation of privilege against self-incrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.