Qiu v. Chertoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing APA claim because there was “no statutory or regulatory provision compelling adjudication within a certain time period”
• “Defendants are also correct that their decision to withhold adjudication at this time falls within their discretion, thus precluding jurisdiction under the mandamus statute and the APA.”
• “The Attorney General may exercise his discretion if ‘(1) the alien makes an application for such adjustment, (2) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence, and (3
• “The Attorney General may exercise his discretion if ‘(1) the alien makes an application for such adjustment, (2) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence, and (3
• “The APA explicitly precludes money damages” claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).