Skip to main content
· 9/28/2009

Qingdao Taifa Group Co., Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 581 F.3d 1375
  • 31 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1449
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21204
  • 2009 WL 3066634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that irreparable harm and likelihood of success on the merits are the most 9 influential factors in a preliminary injunction analysis
  • “[T]he CIT has authority to grant preliminary injunctions barring liquidation in order to preserve a party’s right to challenge the assessed duties.”
  • “In international trade cases, the CIT has authority to grant preliminary injunctions barring liquidation in order to preserve a party’s right to challenge the assessed duties.”
  • absent “any other statutory framework or process to challenge the duties, ... an injunction [i]s the only way to preserve [a domestic interested party’s] ability to challenge the applicable rates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Rader, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.