· 9/28/2009
Qingdao Taifa Group Co., Ltd. v. United States
Citations
- 581 F.3d 1375
- 31 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1449
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21204
- 2009 WL 3066634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that irreparable harm and likelihood of success on the merits are the most 9 influential factors in a preliminary injunction analysis
- “[T]he CIT has authority to grant preliminary injunctions barring liquidation in order to preserve a party’s right to challenge the assessed duties.”
- “In international trade cases, the CIT has authority to grant preliminary injunctions barring liquidation in order to preserve a party’s right to challenge the assessed duties.”
- absent “any other statutory framework or process to challenge the duties, ... an injunction [i]s the only way to preserve [a domestic interested party’s] ability to challenge the applicable rates”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lourie, Rader, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.