Qiao Yi You v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that “insubstantial omissions should not prevent characterizing a record as complete” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding that the omission of a prosecution exhibit that was prima facie evidence of the offense was substantial omission and left the record incomplete
• discussing requirement of Article 19, UCMJ, for a complete record in a special court martial
• finding prosecution exhibit that was prima facie evidence omitted from record was substantial omission and left the record incomplete
• discussing requirement of Article 19, UCMJ, for a complete record in a special court martial
• “A ‘complete record’ is not necessarily a ‘verbatim record.’” (quoting United States v. Whitman, 3 C.M.A. 179, 181, 11 C.M.R. 179, 181 (1953))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).