Skip to main content
· 2/9/2007

Qantum Communications Corp. v. Star Broadcasting, Inc.

Citations

  • 473 F. Supp. 2d 1249
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12009
  • 2007 WL 445307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that misconduct related to “the pivotal or ‘linchpin’ issue in [the] case” weighed “heavily in favor of the severe sanction of default”
  • stating that no-shopping provision is contractual provision that “precludes [the seller] from soliciting, entertaining, or negotiating with entities other than [the buyer] regarding the [purchase assets] while the Agreement is in effect.”
  • “[T]he inherent powers doctrine is most often invoked where a party commits perjury or destroys or doctors evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martinez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.