· 2/9/2007
Qantum Communications Corp. v. Star Broadcasting, Inc.
Citations
- 473 F. Supp. 2d 1249
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12009
- 2007 WL 445307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that misconduct related to “the pivotal or ‘linchpin’ issue in [the] case” weighed “heavily in favor of the severe sanction of default”
- stating that no-shopping provision is contractual provision that “precludes [the seller] from soliciting, entertaining, or negotiating with entities other than [the buyer] regarding the [purchase assets] while the Agreement is in effect.”
- “[T]he inherent powers doctrine is most often invoked where a party commits perjury or destroys or doctors evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martinez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.