Pyne v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• labeling it a “prerequisite” to bring a retaliation charge before the EEOC if the retaliation occurred prior to the filing of the charge
• “Plaintiff has failed to reference a specific law or statute, or even generally describe what law has been violated. Such pleading does not satisfy notice pleading requirements under Federal Rule 8(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).