Pyle v. Martel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the Guidelines should be the starting point and the initial benchmark” for criminal sentences (quoting Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 49 (2007))
• noting that \the Guidelines should be the starting point and the initial benchmark\ for criminal sentences (quoting Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38 , 49, 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) )
• no adequate explanation where “the sentencing court explained only that it had ‘taken into consideration the factors of 3553(a
• “Where 30 an objection has been made, we review the district court’s application of the 4 1 Guidelines de novo, where, as here, the interpretation of the Guidelines is in 2 question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).