Skip to main content
· 6/17/2011

Pye v. Nu Aire, Inc.

Citations

  • 641 F.3d 1011
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12226
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,210
  • 112 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 865
  • 2011 WL 2417058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a Title VII retaliation plaintiff must show as part of his prima facie case that “the adverse action was causally linked to the protected conduct”
  • holding indirect claim of retaliation required showing of McDonnell Douglas framework
  • describing the distinction between a discrimination claim and a hostile work environment claim
  • describing the distinction between a discrimination claim and a hostile work environment claim
  • asking whether other employees “were accused of comparable conduct and not fired”
  • explaining factors for determining whether conduct rises to the level of harassment include frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating; and whether it unreasonably interfered with an employee’s work performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bye, Fleissig

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.