Skip to main content
· 8/26/2002

Putz v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Citations

  • 51 P.3d 979
  • 203 Ariz. 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining there is no bright-line rule for determining when a self-employed employer is subject to the Act
  • describing the Act’s purpose to “hav[e] industry bear its share of the burden of human injury as a cost of doing business”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Ehrlich, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.