· 8/26/2002
Putz v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Citations
- 51 P.3d 979
- 203 Ariz. 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining there is no bright-line rule for determining when a self-employed employer is subject to the Act
- describing the Act’s purpose to “hav[e] industry bear its share of the burden of human injury as a cost of doing business”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Ehrlich, Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.