Putnick v. H.M.C. Associates
Citations
- 137 A.D.2d 179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing failure-to-warn claim because plaintiffs “offered nothing to demonstrate that the warnings provided were inadequate”
- “[Pjlaintiffs testimony that he heard the ladder crack permits the inference that the ladder did not perform as intended.”
- “[P]laintiff’s testimony that he heard the ladder crack permits the inference that the ladder did not perform as intended.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-07-16· cited 46×
- Stalker v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-03-12· cited 16×
- Harrigan v. Super Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-03-14· cited 14×
- Brown v. BorrusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-04-25· cited 14×
- Arnold v. Krause, Inc.W.D. New York· 2005-09-30· cited 14×
- Garrant v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-01-30· cited 11×
- Hubbs v. Joseph EnterprisesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-11-24· cited 1×
- Morgan v. StateNew York State Court of Claims· 1994-09-20· cited 1×
- Keener v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-04-03
- McManus v. Ferno Washington, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-03-31
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1980-02-14· cited 586×
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1983-05-10· cited 467×
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals· 1973-05-03· cited 345×
- Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1977-02-22· cited 163×
- Kelly v. Diesel Construction Division of Carl A. Morse, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1974-07-10· cited 157×
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1973-11-21· cited 110×
- Smith v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-11-09· cited 67×
- Rainbow v. Albert Elia Building Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1975-10-31· cited 36×
- Mead v. Warner Pruyn DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-05-19· cited 25×
- Glielmi v. Toys \R\ Us, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1984-05-01· cited 19×
- Jackson v. MelveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-03-07· cited 16×
- Glielmi v. Toys \R\ Us, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-05-17· cited 16×
- Fox v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-05-04· cited 9×
- Bingham v. GodfreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-11-25· cited 7×
- Yager v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-06-27· cited 6×
- Powles v. Wean United Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-01-20· cited 5×
- Johnson v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-04-22· cited 3×
- Edwards v. NemenyiNew York Court of Appeals· 1984-02-16· cited 2×
- Edwards v. NemenyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-03-03· cited 2×
Other cases named Putnick v. H.M.C. Associates
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.