Skip to main content

Putnam v. State

Citations

  • 582 S.W.2d 146
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that proof that a defendant committed a newly-charged offense while on bail is sufficient to sustain the denial of an appeal bond
  • evidence that appellant committed another offense while on bail far exceeded statutory requirement that court find only that defendant is likely to commit another offense while on bail
  • evidence that appellant committed another offense while on bail far exceeded statutory requirement that court find only that defendant is likely to commit another offense while on bail
  • evidence that appellant committed another offense while on bail far exceeded statutory requirement that court find only that defendant is likely to commit another offense while on bail
  • evidence that the defendant committed another offense while on bail “far exceed[ed]” statutory requirement that court find that the defendant is likely to commit another offense while on bail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Phillips, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.