Skip to main content
· 5/17/1994

Putnam v. Rymes Heating Oils, Inc. (In Re Putnam)

Citations

  • 167 B.R. 737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that granting lavish fees for routine stay violations “will only encourage a cottage industry of precipitous § 362[(k)] litigation”
  • reducing attorneys’ fees by over 50% where, inter alia, the fees bore no relation to the amount of actual damages suffered and where Debtor failed to attempt to settle the matter before filing the motion
  • reducing attorneys’ fees by over 50% where, inter alia, the fees bore no relation to the amount of actual damages suffered and where Debtor failed to attempt to settle the matter before filing the motion
  • two day delay before returning a propane tank used by Debtor for heating, hot water, and cooking a violation of the stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mark W. Vaughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.