Putnam v. Putnam
Citations
- 104 Kan. 47
- 177 P. 838
- 1919 Kan. LEXIS 180
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Divorce and Alimony — Divorce Refused — Division of Property — Statute Constitutional. The provisions of section 7576 of the General Statutes of 1915 (Gen. Stat. 1868, ch. 80, § 643, as amended), which authorize the court in a divorce case, for good cause shown, to make a proper and equitable division of the property acquired through the joint efforts of a husband and wife, although the divorce itself is denied, are constitutional and valid; and in the making of such equitable division, it is not of necessarily controlling significance that such property, when acquired, was taken and held in the name of the husband.</p> <p>2. Same — Where the marital relations of a husband and wife are so discordant and unhappy as to give apparent justification for an action for divorce, the trial court has judicial power in such action to make an equitable division of the property acquired by them during their marriage, although neither party has so grossly offended the marriage obligations as to require the court to grant an absolute divorce.</p> <p>3. Same — Statute Construed. Article 28 of chapter 93 of the General Statutes of 1915 (Civ. Code, § 663 et seq.), relating to divorce and alimony, covers germane and pertinent matters which may be properly determined in a divorce action, although the divorce itself is denied.</p> <p>4. Same — Evidence Supports Judgment. Record examined, and the evidence held sufficient to support the judgment.</p> <p>5. Same — Property Equitably Divided. The division of property examined, and no injustice discerned therein; and the rule followed that, where no manifest.injustice appears, the division of property decreed by the trial court cannot be disturbed.</p> <p>6. Same — When Findings and Judgment are Conclusive. Rule followed that where there is ample evidence to support the findings and judgment, the evidence to the contrary has little significance in an appellate court.</p> <p>7. Same — Award of Money to Wife
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ackers v. First National Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1963-12-19· cited 33×
- Collins v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1966-06-30· cited 25×
- Esselstyn v. CASTEELOregon Supreme Court· 1955-10-05· cited 23×
- Perkins v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-07-05· cited 20×
- Jackson v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1964-05-09· cited 17×
- State v. KoontzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-07-09· cited 15×
- Hendricks v. HendricksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-07-09· cited 15×
- Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-07-07· cited 14×
- Garver v. GarverSupreme Court of Kansas· 1959-01-24· cited 13×
- Hamblin v. MarchantSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-05-10· cited 12×
- Estate of Williams v. LittleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1944-07-08· cited 12×
- Wiles v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1973-04-09· cited 10×
- Crawford v. RuckerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1942-05-09· cited 9×
- Hazelbaker v. ReberSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-03-12· cited 6×
- Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-06-07· cited 5×
- Huston v. TowerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-07-07· cited 4×
- Molter v. CommissionerBoard of Tax Appeals· 1930-05-12· cited 1×
- Young v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division· 1930-06-25
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Clark v. AllamanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-04-08· cited 52×
- Hamblin v. MarchantSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-10-12· cited 29×
- Brecheisen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-11-09· cited 18×
- Bowers v. BowersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-11-05· cited 13×
- McKelvey v. McKelveySupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-03-09· cited 13×
- Sattig v. SmallSupreme Court of Kansas· 1862-07-15· cited 9×
- Danielson v. DanielsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-12-09· cited 8×
- McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-05-12· cited 5×
- Rullman v. RullmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-07-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.