Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 9/20/1974

Putnam v. Putnam

Citations

316 N.E.2d 729
366 Mass. 261
1974 Mass. LEXIS 716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

on report from Probate and Family Court on statement of agreed facts, ambiguous provision in will regarding marital tax deduction resolved by reference to extrinsic evidence
“The fundamental object in the construction of a will is to ascertain the testator’s intention from the whole instrument . . . and to give effect to that intent unless some positive rule of law forbids”
considering wife’s will testator reviewed prior to drafting his own
“It would be a rare case in which a conflict of terms or an ambiguity in a will should be resolved by attributing to the testator an intention which as a practical matter is likely to benefit the taxing authorities and no one else.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Braucher, Quirico, Reardon, Tauro, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.