Skip to main content

Putnam v. Jenkins

Citations

  • 285 P.2d 532
  • 204 Or. 691
  • 1955 Ore. LEXIS 309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testamentary devises of property need not be described with the accuracy necessary in the case of a deed
  • extrinsic evidence is admissible to show the meaning of language employed by the testator or to apply the description in a testamentary instrument to the land actually covered by the description, but is not admissible “to show an intention not otherwise expressed in the writing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner, Latotjrette, Rossman, Lusk, Brand, Tooze, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.