Oregon Supreme Court· 6/29/1955
Putnam v. Jenkins
Citations
- 285 P.2d 532
- 204 Or. 691
- 1955 Ore. LEXIS 309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testamentary devises of property need not be described with the accuracy necessary in the case of a deed
- extrinsic evidence is admissible to show the meaning of language employed by the testator or to apply the description in a testamentary instrument to the land actually covered by the description, but is not admissible “to show an intention not otherwise expressed in the writing”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warner, Latotjrette, Rossman, Lusk, Brand, Tooze, Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.