Putnam v. Eli Lilly and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering disclosure of class list of employees, recognizing that “a protective order can strike the appropriate balance between the need for information and privacy concerns”
• “[I]t seems to the Court that contact 14 with [class members] could well be useful to the plaintiff to determine, at minimum, the 15 commonality and typically prongs of Rule 23.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).