Skip to main content
· 3/14/1990

Putnam County National Bank of Carmel v. Hough (In Re Hough)

Citations

  • 111 B.R. 445
  • 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 545
  • 1990 WL 31451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The court finding it “inappropriate for the debtors to argue that their debt to the plaintiff should be dischargeable because the plaintiff believed them....”
  • The court finding it “inappropriate for the debtors to argue that their debt to the plaintiff should be dischargeable because the plaintiff believed them ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard Schwartzberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.