Skip to main content
· 3/30/2005

Putkowski v. Warwick Valley Central School District

Citations

  • 363 F. Supp. 2d 649
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5396
  • 2005 WL 767879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiff’s complaint does not allege that he has satisfied the notice of claim requirement, and in response to the District’s motion plaintiff has not proved compliance with the requirement.”
  • interpreting “three months” as 90 days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMahon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.