· 3/30/2005
Putkowski v. Warwick Valley Central School District
Citations
- 363 F. Supp. 2d 649
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5396
- 2005 WL 767879
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Plaintiff’s complaint does not allege that he has satisfied the notice of claim requirement, and in response to the District’s motion plaintiff has not proved compliance with the requirement.”
- interpreting “three months” as 90 days
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMahon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.