Pushinsky v. West Virginia Board of Law Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that state constitution imposes more stringent limitations on power of state to inquire into lawful associations and speech than those imposed by federal constitution
• recognizing that state constitution imposes more stringent limitations on power of state to inquire into lawful associations and speech than those imposed by federal constitution
• recognizing that state constitution imposes more stringent limitations on power of state to inquire into lawful associations and speech than those imposed by federal constitution
• recognizing that state constitution imposes more stringent limitations on power of state to inquire into lawful associations and speech than those imposed by federal constitution
• concluding that questions that inquired into beliefs and associations of applicant for admission to the West Virginia State Bar unconstitutionally infringed upon applicant’s association rights guaranteed under West Virginia Constitution article III, section 7
• concluding that questions that inquired into beliefs and associations of applicant for admission to the West Virginia State Bar unconstitutionally infringed upon applicant’s association rights guaranteed under West Virginia Constitution article III, section 7

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).