Pusey v. Natkin & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was not substantial evidence to support the Industrial Accident Board‟s ruling when the claimant produced unrebutted evidence “which the Board could not ignore”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Murphy & Landon, P.A. v. Pernic
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-08-26· cited 51×
• Clements v. Diamond State Port Corp.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2003-08-14· cited 22×
• Fowler v. Perdue Farms, Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-03-16
• Cantoni v. Delaware Park Racetrack & Slots
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2023-03-16

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. Chrysler Corporation
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1965-07-21· cited 272×
• General Motors Corporation v. Freeman
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1960-11-04· cited 111×
• LeBrun v. Woonsocket Spinning Co.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1969-11-13· cited 11×
• Peters v. Chrysler Corporation
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1972-07-27· cited 11×
• Carroll v. Tarburton
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1965-04-07· cited 10×
• Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Farley
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1972-04-04· cited 7×
• National Vulcanized Fibre Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1951-07-02· cited 4×
• Windsor v. Bell Shades & Floor Coverings
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1979-09-04· cited 2×
• Cooper v. Chrysler Corp.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1981-02-09· cited 2×
• American Insurance v. Iaconi
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1951-06-04· cited 1×