Skip to main content
· 6/7/2011

Pusey v. BECTON DICKINSON AND CO.

Citations

  • 794 F. Supp. 2d 551
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60929
  • 2011 WL 2200144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “because we grant summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ primary claims, we will also dismiss . . . [plaintiff] Donald’s [derivative] loss of consortium [claim]”
  • dismissing the spouse’s loss of consortium claim after granting summary judgment on the plaintiff’s claims
  • “the critical juncture for determining admissibility under Rule 407 is the occurrence of harm, not the event precipitating that harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dalzell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.