Purvis v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that same act or transaction test not met if each offense was separate act occurring at different time and location
• holding that the facts did not support a finding of a “common plan”
• finding burglaries improperly joined where they occurred two months apart and one involved the theft of cash while the other involved the theft of postage stamps
• noting that a harmless error does not require reversal
• noting that a harmless error does not require reversal
• noting that a harmless error does not require reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).