Skip to main content
· 6/6/1994

Purtle v. Committee On Professional Conduct

Citations

  • 317 Ark. 278
  • 878 S.W.2d 714
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an inverse-condemnation action is brought under the eminent-domain provisions of the Georgia Constitution requiring the payment of compensation for the taking or damaging of private property for public purposes
  • explaining that an inverse-condemnation action is brought under the eminent-domain provisions of the Georgia Constitution, requiring the payment of compensation for the taking or damaging of private property for public purposes
  • “[N]o sovereign immunity exists where a cause of action for inverse condemnation lies, because the Constitution itself affords the right.”
  • “An ‘inverse condemnation’ action is brought under the eminent domain provisions of the Georgia Constitution ‘requiring the payment of compensation for the taking or damaging of private property for public purposes.’ ” (citation omitted)
  • “An ‘inverse condemnation’ action is brought under the eminent domain provisions of the Georgia Constitution ‘requiring the payment of compensation for the taking or damaging of private property for public purposes.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Compton, Corbin, Drake, Dudley, Glaze, Hays, Hodges, Holt, Laws, Newbern, Vote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.