Skip to main content
· 3/31/1994

Purohit v. State

Citations

  • 638 A.2d 1206
  • 99 Md. App. 566
  • 1994 Md. App. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant did not preserve for appeal his claim that the prosecutor made improper statements as to the first of two remarks because the defendant failed to object to that portion of the State’s closing argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Alpert, Wenner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.