· 3/31/1994
Purohit v. State
Citations
- 638 A.2d 1206
- 99 Md. App. 566
- 1994 Md. App. LEXIS 53
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant did not preserve for appeal his claim that the prosecutor made improper statements as to the first of two remarks because the defendant failed to object to that portion of the State’s closing argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Alpert, Wenner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.