Purofied Down Products Corp. v. Travelers Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that in-house counsel’s recollection of any facts learned during his internal investigation would be “so intertwined with mental impressions” as to amount to “opinion work product”
• observing that the actual disclosure of work product to a government agency does not waive protection as to all information related to or underlying the work product
• observing that the actual disclosure of work product to a government agency does not waive protection as to all information related to or underlying the work product
• availability of interviewed witness to be deposed undermined the necessity that a litigation adversary “invade the attorney’s files”
• “Generally, documents created as part of an internal investigation . . . are considered to be made in anticipation of litigation for the purposes of the work product doctrine.”
• “Generally, documents created as part of an internal investigation . . . are considered to be made in anticipation of litigation for the purposes of the work product doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).